FCC proposed rules on robotexting and robocall prevention

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has proposed rules to prevent robotexting and robocalls to reassigned numbers. Here are the details.

Declaratory ruling on text messaging

FCC Chairman Ajit Pai

This rule would clearly establish that text messaging services are information services, not telephone services. This distinction would allow carriers to continue to use robotext blocking and anti-spoofing measures to protect consumers from unwanted text messages, called robotexts.

“Americans rely on and trust text messaging,” said FCC Chairman Ajit Pai. “That’s why we need to act to prevent a deluge of spam texts and scam messages.”

Order to create database of reassigned numbers

This order would call for the creation of a single, comprehensive database of reassigned numbers. This information would be provided by phone companies that obtain North American Numbering Plan U.S. geographic numbers.

Millions of telephone numbers are reassigned each year. While reassigning numbers is an efficient use of the number pool, it can cause problems for everyone involved:

  • Subscribers with reassigned numbers get unwanted calls intended for the previous telephone number holders.
  • Subscribers miss calls from parties they forgot to notify after changing their phone numbers.
  • Organizations with prior authorized consent are unable to contact their customers and inadvertently annoy new number holders instead.

The reassigned numbers database would enable legitimate callers to check whether a number has been reassigned and thereby avoid making unwanted calls.

Chairman Pai explained, “I’m also proposing new rules to help reduce robocalls to reassigned numbers by creating a database that will help legitimate businesses stop calling those numbers.”

The FCC will discuss these items at its Open Commission Meeting on December 12, 2018.


November 4, 2024

FCC proposes new STIR/SHAKEN rules on third-party signing

October 2, 2024

STIR/SHAKEN statistics from September 2024

September 4, 2024

STIR/SHAKEN statistics from August 2024

August 28, 2024

Lingo FCC compliance plan and lessons for other providers

August 12, 2024

STIR/SHAKEN statistics from July 2024

July 3, 2024

STIR/SHAKEN statistics from June 2024

June 5, 2024

STIR/SHAKEN statistics from May 2024

May 29, 2024

Originating provider fined for improper attestation

May 6, 2024

STIR/SHAKEN statistics from April 2024

April 17, 2024

STIR/SHAKEN in France

April 1, 2024

STIR/SHAKEN statistics from March 2024

March 4, 2024

STIR/SHAKEN statistics from February 2024

February 14, 2024

STIR/SHAKEN statistics from January 2024

January 25, 2024

Compliance dates announced for updated SHAKEN rules

January 3, 2024

STIR/SHAKEN statistics from December 2023

December 18, 2023

SHAKEN deadline for non-gateway intermediate providers

December 6, 2023

STIR/SHAKEN statistics from November 2023

November 8, 2023

STIR/SHAKEN statistics from October 2023

October 18, 2023

Out-of-Band SHAKEN revisions

September 20, 2023

How to monitor SHAKEN signer reputation

August 30, 2023

U.K. progress on central number database for STIR/SHAKEN

July 27, 2023

Rich Call Data and caller identity

June 19, 2023

Can Rich Call Data solve incorrect spam call labeling?

May 31, 2023

Branded calling, Know-Your-Customer, and STIR/SHAKEN